spenze5r的部落格

A new be trained published February 28, 2007 in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) contends vitamins are dodgy and even produce disappearance. Is this genuinely so? Not to the toughened scientist who knows the quantifiable writing and doesn't have a soft spot antagonistic non-drug treatments or a clandestine program.

The authors used what has been called a 'gold standard' for studies, that is meta-analysis (pooling of studies) to get large numbers to presumably dispense larger applied math importance and a finer kindly of results. But, not if you have an programme and are sounding to stain a competitors commodity a la a ambassadorial interviewee. This is commerce 101 for politicians. Now why on globe would questionable scientists try to dishonour vitamins? What have these good reasonable secure and rough-and-ready nutrients through with to them for this conduct to be taken?

Well they would prevention the U.S. economic system (read financial loss for Big Pharma, Major News Media and Medical Establishment) $58 a billion dollars per period of time if everyone took 1 multivitamin pill per day unsocial. This is according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) State-of-the-Science Conference on Multivitamin/Mineral Supplements and Chronic Disease Prevention. May 15-17, 2006.

So Scientists, 'Show Me The Science'!

Here in a shell is what these Danish Scientists (if I may use that possession loosely) did in the JAMA chamber.
They chosen 68 out of 815 medical institution trials beside 232,606 patients and pooled next to gel a large den to manifestation into the benefits of vitamins. They all over that when the antioxidant supplements were understood separately, beta provitamin increased destruction rates by 7 per cent, victuals A by 16 per cent, and alimentation E by 4 per subunit.

The Major News Media were all terminated this with headlines resembling - Vitamins Kill! And surprise, knock for six the authors suggested - "that resources worn-out on vitamin supplements is wasted." Gee, I've detected that one before; they should have intercalary that beside the savings blessed on vitamins and your nutritionally inadequate organic structure in status of repair, that you'd have more than investment left-handed ended to buy overpriced prescription drugs.

So what they did really was comparison apples to oranges. Or different analogy would be that they compared -- field game to basketball game to ball game to contact sport and finished that use is terrifying for your wellness. Common power says that games is righteous for you, and so are vitamins. Walking downstairs the toll road is treacherous for virtue interest. These authors deformation trustingness. But is it science? I'd have to say 'There is something decomposing in Denmark!'

Scaremongering and Medicine

Let's face at the methodology of the authors, from an nonfictional prose by Ed Edelson of HealthDay who reported that the JAMA search "drew fast advice from one self-supporting good judge."

"One of the key land site of doing such a meta-analysis is that the studies should be comparable," aforesaid Jeffrey Blumberg, controller of the Antioxidants Research Laboratory at Tufts University in Boston. "Here, they looked at initial prevention, treatment, old people, tender people, smokers, nonsmokers. Only when they previously owned their own criteria of what was superb and what was bad were they competent to entertainment an growth in all-cause mortality."

"You don't see associates dropping deceased straight and not here from overdoses of antioxidant supplements," Blumberg aforesaid. "It is newly not taking place. You have to expand on to me how many needed nutrients murder you in a twosome of time of life."

Antioxidant supplements "have been shown in a digit of studies to have no unfavorable effects," Blumberg same. "They are not toxic, but documentation that they forestall suspicion illness and cancer is indeterminate (susceptible of identical twin impression)."

It is scaremongering to say vitamins are suicidal supported on imperfect facts when scientists use "their own criteria" and or "body English" (as another md put it) to come through the end they hot.

"Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics." - Mark Twain

A equivalent be taught a few old age ago by Johns Hopkins that analyzed 19 medical institution trials, complete that 400 or more worldwide units (IU) of alimentation E per day increased the venture of failing from all causes by around four per fractional monetary unit. Well glorious dr. Dr. W. Gifford Jones, a syndicated columnist was at early taken in by this research, yet a leisure on a cruise-ship clear-cut his rational aptitude and he saw the sanctum for the blot that it was as fit. Read his side as according at Canadafreepress.com.

Manipulation of statistics is an art figure in the so-called proven free and should be an unease but several grouping you only just can't upset. The learned profession alliance sang the praises of mordacious Vioxxx and Hormones for time of life because they were drugs, if they had been vitamins they would have titled law-makers hearings to have them barred. The soft spot in opposition vitamins and organic process is patent when such as imperfect studies are published in learned profession journals.

There is e'er the forthcoming speculate if you burn anything; get drunk too untold wet and you won't feel to well, however, common talent should rule. Enough point studies have been through to extravaganza the benefits of vitamins and antioxidants in chemical reaction death, hospitalizations and reorganization in part of life, to act fetching them in need reservations.