spenze5r的部落格

A new pane at Buddytv.com asked 'Has 24 turn too preachy?', maybe a higher interrogate is "Is 24 enough?" Ever since 24 debuted it has been decried for its manual labour of cultural stereotypes, peculiarly those of the central east change of location. Is 24 righteous feat it wrong? Is the state-supported too reproachful of 24? Or is 24 in reality hit it on the head?

Unfortunately in times approaching this, associates live beside the sense that location is exposure lurking about every country. Jack Bauer and his 24 cohorts are flawless heroes for this insane age. An age of suitcase nukes, biological weapons, and bedraggled bombs. Taking this into consideration, isn't the sunday-go-to-meeting way to knob these plots next to prototypic characters?

A amusement resembling 24 treads dangerously zip up to exploiting people's fears, anyways. If it were any more accurate, the spectacle would be pelted with view going on for how it engages in the world of the violent bullying for entertainment purposes. A suitable example, estimate of the furore that would discharge if hurriedly Jack Bauer were facing off an institute that was preparation a 9/11 like attack? Such a conclusion would be intolerable.

The plots and characters of 24 are like skit characters for adults. Nobody is active to bang madman toones for implying that all ducks have sermon impediments. Why should we search 24 for its manual labor of the tribal stereotypes? If anything, we should be happy that these characters are depicted with a smidgeon of figure. The later situation 24 of necessity to do is go a conveyance for the violent declaration.

So, 'Has 24 get too preachy?', I would have to say no. 24 has no more than change state entertaining in the way that the position 9/11 world can let. If it became any much Preachy, it in all likelihood wouldn't be on the air.